Systems psychology
Or this module’s research paper, provide your definition and explanation of what constitutes human factors as a systems discipline. Provide a timeline to illustrate your main points. Follow the formatting guidelines of the APA Manual where needed in your creative assignment.
Examine the Research below to identify the qualities of an effective assignment.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContext/Introduction
15 pts
Excellent / 13 – 15 Points / Paper provides an effective introduction and a research problem that is intrinsically related to the field of aeronautical science.
It presents strong relationships between factors with accurate real-world examples. It develops a coherent, central theme that is expressed in a well-structured, organized, and logically-consistent manner throughout the assignment.
12 pts
Satisfactory / 11 – 12 Points / Paper provides a good introduction and a research problem related to the field of aeronautical science. It presents reasonable relationships between factors with real-world examples.
It develops a good central theme that is expressed in a structured, organized and consistent manner throughout the assignment.
10 pts
Passing / 9 – 10 / Paper provides a satisfactory introduction. Research problem is fairly related to the field of aeronautical science.
It provides satisfactory relationships between factors with examples and specific details. It develops some level of a central theme that is expressed in an acceptably organized manner.
8 pts
Failure / 0 – 8 Points / Paper provides poor or no introduction. Research problem is inadequate and/or has no relation to the field of aeronautical science.
It presents no coherent central theme, no structure and no organization whatsoever.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch
25 pts
Excellent / 23 – 25 Points / Paper provides a comprehensive identification and analysis of key issues in the realm of aeronautical science.
It designs an effective course of action to solve the proposed research problem using multi-disciplinary principles, if appropriate.
The evidence comes from a wide variety of valid sources. The bibliography is complete and reflects the appropriate sources.
22 pts
Satisfactory / 21 – 22 Points / Paper provides a good identification and analysis of key issues in the realm of aeronautical science. It designs a good course of action to solve the proposed research problem using multi-disciplinary principles, if appropriate. The evidence comes from many valid sources. The bibliography is complete.
20 pts
Passing / 19 – 20 Points / Paper identifies and analyzes at least a few key issues in the realm of aeronautical science. It designs a satisfactory course of action to solve the proposed research problem. The evidence comes from a satisfactory number of sources. The bibliography is missing some pieces.
18 pts
Failure / 0 – 18 Points / Writing generally shows poor or no evidence the student has done the required research and analysis of key issues in the realm of aeronautical science. Instead, it generally consists of opinions, feelings and impressions. The bibliography is nonexistent.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComprehension
25 pts
Excellent / 23 – 25 Points / Paper presents a strong, well-supported argument based on relevant concepts and theories, providing new ideas to the field of aeronautical science.
Argument is logical and uses significant examples, evidence, research, and/or data from course content and from valid, external information sources throughout assignment.
22 pts
Satisfactory / 21 – 22 Points / Paper presents a good argument based on pertinent concepts, theories, and frameworks that provides some ideas to the field of aeronautical science.
Argument is logical and uses good examples, evidence, research, and/or data from course content and from satisfactory external information sources throughout assignment.
20 pts
Passing / 19 – 20 Points / Paper presents a valid argument with sparse reference to relevant concepts, theories and/or frameworks that provides ideas to the field of aeronautical science.
Argument is fairly logical and uses satisfactory examples, evidence, research, and/or data from course content and from external information sources throughout assignment.
18 pts
Failure / 0 – 18 Points / Argument, when presented, is from evidence and personal opinion. It contains poor linkages to relevant concepts, theories and/or framework. Minimal or no evidence is presented to validate analysis, evaluation or other important elements in the assignment.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication
25 pts
Excellent / 23 – 25 Points / Decisions and conclusions are a result of outstanding analysis and synthesis of evidence. Formulates excellent resolution and recommendations.
Conclusion includes possible consequences and outcome scenarios.
22 pts
Satisfactory / 21 – 22 Points / Decisions and conclusions are a result of effective analysis and synthesis of evidence. It formulates good resolution, recommendations.
Conclusion includes consequences and outcome scenarios.
20 pts
Passing / 19 – 20 Points / Decisions and conclusions are a result of good analysis and synthesis of evidence. Formulates satisfactory resolution, recommendations. Conclusion does not include consequences and outcome scenarios.
18 pts
Failure / 0 – 18 Points / A partial or minimal attempt is made to offer a resolution, recommendations. Conclusion may be vague, incomplete and/or inappropriate.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle & Mechanics
10 pts
Excellent / 8 – 10 Points / Paper efficiently uses current APA guidelines in citations and references. Text is grammatically-sound and free of spelling errors and follows required formatting rules.
10 pts
Passing / 4 – 5 Points / APA guidelines are seldom ignored throughout text, which has major grammar and spelling errors. Formatting rules are satisfactory followed.
10 pts
Satisfactory / 6 – 7 Points / Paper uses current APA guidelines in citations and references. Text has minor grammar and spelling errors, but follows required formatting rules.
3 pts
Failure / 0 – 3 Points / Citations, when present, are sometimes missing and/or are incorrect. A low level of writing is exhibited with a number of mechanical mistakes. Communication is muddle or incomprehensible.
10 pts
Total Points: 100
