Compare the strengths & weaknesses of Grant Thornton’s Legislative Drafting principles in our present-day modern, technologically savvy societies where interaction is instant, blurring the lines between the legislative drafter and policy maker and the effect on ‘good practical law’.

An analysis on how the Integrity of the Legislative Drafting Process Is Maintained / Buffered from the ‘overarching’ policymaker ‘the politician’ in a Small Nation State (Saint Lucia).

Compare the strengths & weaknesses of Grant Thornton’s Legislative Drafting principles in our present-day modern, technologically savvy societies where interaction is instant, blurring the lines between the legislative drafter and policy maker and the effect on ‘good practical law’.

Juxtaposing the view of Prof. Helen Xanthaki, who proffers a perspective that ‘Cross- Fertilization’ between Common Law and Civil Law jurisdictions offers a more practical approach to ‘good draft legislation’.

– Further, which of Thornton’s five (5) are critical to ensuring the Legislative Draft remains pristine and true to the initial issued Drafting Instruction.