Critically describe, comprehend and discuss the role, principles, function and application of research design within both academic and/or applied business contexts

Understand the scientific process, its application in economics and business, and its utilisation in the problem-solving approach to business and management challenges.

Demonstrate the skills necessary to assess and interpret existing research as a prelude to carrying out further investigation

Critically describe, comprehend and discuss the role, principles, function and application of research design within both academic and/or applied business contexts

Understand, critically comprehend different research strategies and be able to apply with insight appropriate research methodologies to differing types of research problems, hypotheses, or fields of investigation

Conceptualise and formulate a research project, including the formation of a hypothesis; the identification of field and evidence; the identification of research methodological

approaches; the carrying out of a sustained piece of research, and the forming of conclusions while evaluating and applying the outcomes of research to a context/problem or issue

Demonstrate and apply the researching skills and project management skills which are required and which are necessary to carrying out a successful and sustained piece of individual work which may be applicable to academic

What was the tradition of inquiry/methodological approach (e.g., historical, social/political, philosophical/ethnographic, case study, phenomenology, heuristic, hermeneutic, etc.)?

Journal article review, Interests, and Research Question

What was the rationale of the study? How is this particular study adding to the body of knowledge in the field? How did the article mention disputes or limitations that might influence this study? What might be a robust research question based on your research interests in light of the findings in the article?

Review of Qualitative Article (1 page): What was the rationale for the study? What was the purpose statement?

What was the tradition of inquiry/methodological approach (e.g., historical, social/political, philosophical/ethnographic, case study, phenomenology, heuristic, hermeneutic, etc.)?

How is this particular study adding to the body of knowledge in the field? How did the article mention disputes or limitations that might influence this study?

What might be a robust research question based on your research interests in light of the findings in the two journal articles?

What methodological approach provides a powerful lens for delineating social studies teachers as curricular-instructional gatekeepers? Why? How does your chosen methodological perspective and study design build on or extend previous work in this area?

Thornton (1991, 2005) and van Hover et al. (2010) have described social studies teachers as curricular-instructional gatekeepers who exercise some control over the topics and perspectives taught in classrooms.

Crocco and Livingston (2017) contended that “satisfactory gatekeeping,” for social studies teaching “depends on the elements” Shulman identified in his work on PCK (p. 367).

PCK, Shulman (1987) wrote, “represents the blending of content and pedagogy into an understanding of how particular topics, problems, or issues are organized, represented, and adapted to the diverse interests and abilities of learners, and presented for instruction” (p. 8).

Taking into account this work, what methodological approach provides a powerful lens for delineating social studies teachers as curricular-instructional gatekeepers? Why? How does your chosen methodological perspective and study design build on or extend previous work in this area?