What factors do Ted Brown and Jim Green (or their sons on their behalf) need to consider in selecting a form for this business?What form of business will provide the most advantage for their venture?

Unit VII Business Law Case Study
Can Theodore Brown and James Green legally create the business that Ted Brown and Jim Green have been discussing? Why, or why not?

If Theodore and James do create the business, what duties do they each owe their father? Describe what those duties mean in this case.

What factors do Ted Brown and Jim Green (or their sons on their behalf) need to consider in selecting a form for this business?

What form of business will provide the most advantage for their venture?

What are the disadvantages of the form of business that they selected?

Your case study should be at least four pages in length and include at least two outside sources, one of which must come from the CSU Online Library. Be sure to use APA formatting for all citations and references. note that no abstract is needed.

Explain whether you think the case manager is sufficient enough support for the drug-court client in each component or if you feel that the family, peers, or client should also serve as a case manager. Support your positions with evidence from the text.

Roles of the Case Manager

Explain whether you think the case manager is sufficient enough support for the drug-court client in each component or if you feel that the family, peers, or client should also serve as a case manager. Support your positions with evidence from the text.

Examine whether there is reason to think the pertinent arguments are indeed in contradiction with one another, as suggested by the statement quoted above.

Plato’s Protagoras

At the end of Plato’s Protagoras, Socrates suggests to Protagoras that the outcome of the argument is to leave both of them looking ridiculous. (361a). Here is how Socrates describes the situation, from what he imagines would be the discussion’s point of view:

Socrates, you said earlier that virtue cannot be taught, but now are arguing the very opposite and have attempted to show that everything is knowledge— justice, temperance, courage — in which case, virtue would appear to be eminently teachable. On the other hand, if virtue is anything other than knowledge, as Protagoras has been trying to say, then it would clearly be unteachable. (361b)

Notice that Socrates goes no further than to say than this is how the situation appears. He does not acknowledge a genuine contradiction in his own prior arguments — he’s just conceding the impression of one, in the interest of broaching a further investigation of the issues.

For this assignment, you are invited to assess this impression of the situation, through a consideration and assessment of the following proposition:

If Socrates’ arguments on behalf of the unity of virtue and knowledge are valid, those same arguments also imply that he cannot consistently reject Protagoras’ reasons for thinking that virtue is teachable.

1. You are not required, nor expected, to pass judgment on the overall validity of the arguments under discussion. The assignment calls simply for you to examine whether there is reason to think the pertinent arguments are indeed in contradiction with one another, as suggested by the statement quoted above. (To do this, however, you must take the arguments seriously, as arguments, advanced by characters who care about being found persuasive).

2. Your primary responsibility in writing this essay is to offer a potential contribution toward your (hypothetical) reader’s gaining a more complete comprehension of the arguments in Plato’s Protagoras. This does not mean you’re expected to resolve every ambiguity or obscurity in those arguments. But it also doesn’t mean that you can freely disregard what you deem ambiguous or obscure, or inconvenient to your interpretation. Your task is to make as much sense of the material that you can, and then (if need be) pinpoint as precisely as possible what remains obscure to you, or otherwise unresolved. This itself is a contribution toward an enlarged comprehension of the work under discussion.

3. Citations to the text should be given with Stephanus numbers. You may provide the citations parenthetically within the body of your essay. (See the format used in the “Euthyphro Study Guide”). As this is a short paper. direct quotations should be kept to a minimum – i.e., used only when truly needed for purpose of making a point. However,  note that you are expected to provide citations for all references to specific statements or references in the text, whether or not you quote from the text directly.

How do you meet the minimum state health requirements for both the child and themselves (i.e., vaccinations, good nutrition, a safe and healthy home environment, etc.).

MAP-IT SLP 2

For module 2 you are to complete the following tasks:

Using MAP-IT to Help Build a Healthy Community

MAP-IT means: Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, and Track

To begin to achieve the goal of improving health, a community must develop a strategy. That strategy, to be successful, must be supported by many individuals who are working together.

In much the same way you might map out a trip to a new place, you can use the MAP-IT technique to “map out” the path toward the change you want to see in your community.

For the Session Long Project (SLP) of this course, you will follow one of the following families:

A non-English speaking immigrant family. The parents, (a 35-year-old father and 31-year-old mother) have a 1-year-old son. They (the parents) are obese, smokers, alcoholics, and have only a high school education.

Due to their weight, the mother has diabetes and high blood pressure, and the father has high blood pressure and kidney disease. The parents are a low-income family with no insurance.

You will guide the parents on how to meet the minimum state health requirements for both the child and themselves (i.e., vaccinations, good nutrition, a safe and healthy home environment, etc.).

4. For this module you will assess the areas of greatest need in your community, in this case, assisting your target family to access health care, as well as the resources and other strengths that you can tap into in order to address those areas.

For this module you will assess the areas of greatest need in your community, in this case, assisting your target family to access health care, as well as the resources and other strengths that you can tap into in order to address those areas.

Length: Your paper should be 4-6 double-spaced pages (800-1,300 words) in length, excluding title page and references.

What does the “back of the house” mean? How can information that you learned in this course about the “back of the house” be applied to your life and/or work to increase your future success?

Unit VIII

What does the “back of the house” mean? How can information that you learned in this course about the “back of the house” be applied to your life and/or work to increase your future success?

Your journal entry must be at least 200 words. No references or citations are necessary.

Discuss the philosophy of palliative care and how it relates to the provision of effective supportive and end oflife care, in your clinical practice.Critically evaluate the importance of communication skills in the delivery of care to individualsand their carers,with advanced and terminal disease.

Terminal restlessness- symptoms management in palliative care

Discuss the philosophy of palliative care and how it relates to the provision of effective supportive and end oflife care, in your clinical practice

2) Critically explorethe multi-professional and ethical issues inherent in the provision of palliative care.

3) Critically analyse the principles of symptom management to enhance patient’s quality of life and death.

4) Critically evaluate the importance of communication skills in the delivery of care to individualsand their carers,with advanced and terminal disease.

5) Demonstrate a critical understanding of the transitions between acute, palliative and end of life care.

Discuss your understanding of qualitative methods and quantitative methods. Then, discuss your understanding of formative and summative evaluations.

Program evaluation

Ethical Formative and Summative Evaluation Plans

As noted in the course overview, you will not only address obtaining a grant, but maintaining one as well. Funding sources are very particular about how you monitor ongoing progress towards proposed outcomes. Part of the grant application and periodic reporting will be your evaluation plan. There are usually two types of evaluation: formative (or ongoing) and summative (or outcome-based).

You will need to use the readings and resources provided in this course to make decisions about how you will show you are making progress. This step is similar to your practice evaluations of client progress.

You have several choices ranging from quantitative measures such as surveys, arrest rates, hospitalization rates, and frequency of use, to more qualitative measures such as exit interviews, focus groups, or listening groups. Triangulation of data sources helps to ensure validity of results. Using three or more data sources (often mixing qualitative and quantitative measures) can be effective.

In a 4–6 page paper, discuss your understanding of qualitative methods and quantitative methods. Then, discuss your understanding of formative and summative evaluations.

Choose a combination of qualitative and quantitative measures for a formative (on-going) then a summative (final outcome) evaluation of each of your eight outcomes.

For example, if you had an outcome that stated that 30-day use of alcohol among adolescents would be reduced by 50 percent, you could use an annual underage drinking survey to plot if a percentage of teens are consuming less alcohol in a 30-day period. This is considered a quantitative method.

You could also gather a listening group of 10–12 adolescents who would be open, honest, and knowledgeable, and ask their perception of alcohol consumption among teens. This is considered a qualitative method. You may choose to use the listening sessions as formative evaluation and pre-and post-survey for summative evaluation. You need to rely on scholarly sources to defend your choices for all items listed above.

Submission Requirements

Your paper should meet the following requirements:

Written communication: Develop accurate written communication and thoughts that convey the overall goals of the assignment and do not detract from the overall message. Your paper should demonstrate graduate-level writing skills.

References: 8–12 references to text, peer reviewed journal articles, and/or credible websites (no more than 3 web sources).

Number of pages: 4–6 double-spaced pages. Note: Page count does not include cover page or references. Abstract not required.

Formatting: Use 12-pt, Arial or Times New Roman font; MS Word documents only.

APA style and formatting: Use current APA style and formatting.

Critically examine the post. Did the student properly summarize the standards in Garner and Graham? Did they apply the law to the actions seen/heard on the video?  support your conclusions.

CRJ 870-G01 Week 4 Discussion Assignment 2 – Deadly Force Response to Classmate

After you have completed your initial post,  read over the post of one other student and compose a reply to that post. Your reply post must have a minimum of 350 words.

Critically examine the post. Did the student properly summarize the standards in Garner and Graham? Did they apply the law to the actions seen/heard on the video?  support your conclusions.

There is no need to look for any references other than Garner, Graham, or the video itself.