Critically evaluate the paper.What is the main weakness? How could the study be improved?What are the main limitations? (Authors often evaluate these in the discussion..) How these limitations could be addressed in a new study?What is the next step?

Laughter is in the air: involvement of key nodes of the emotional motor system in the anticipation of tickling
Critically evaluate the paper. What is the main weakness? How could
the study be improved?

What are the main limitations? (Authors often evaluate these in the

discussion..) How these limitations could be addressed in a new study?

What is the next step?

How two alternative interpretations could be tested?

Try to develop a proposal that that has important theoretical and/or
practical implications

Try to keep the study simple (easier to explain and understand)

Be scientifically ambitious (the study can be expensive and
demanding to carry ou