What is the tone of the review? Is it humorous, serious, pessimistic, optimistic? Something else entirely? What makes you say that?Look back at what you wrote for number one. Do you think the review effectively accomplished its main point? Why or why not? Do you find it persuasive? Why or why not?

 The Anthopocene Reviewed Introduction

Read: the following in-The Anthropocene Reviewed.

1. “The Hall of Presidents” by John Green from The Anthropocene Reviewed.
2. “New Partner” by John Green from The Anthropocene Reviewed.
3. “Academic Decathlon” by John Green from The Anthropocene Reviewed

Do:
1. Complete The Anthropocene Reviewed Reflection 1

2. Answer the following five questions in one document (must be a Word file or PDF).  number each question clearly.

The Anthropocene Reviewed Reflection 1
First, take a few minutes to reflect on what you read. Next, pick one review to focus on and provide thoughtful and thorough answers to the following questions. The answers should be, roughly speaking, at least 3-5 sentences (more isn’t a bad thing!).

1. What is the main point of the review? It might be to inform, to inspire, to persuade, to change your perspective, or something else entirely.

2. What is the tone of the review? Is it humorous, serious, pessimistic, optimistic? Something else entirely? What makes you say that?

3. What is one section of the review that stood out to you and why? In your answer, provide a quotation for this section and explain why you think this quotation is important.

4. Where do you see ethos, pathos, or logos in the review? Again, provide a quotation for where you see an example of ethos, pathos, or logos and explain if you think John’s use of this rhetorical appeal is effective or not and why.

5. Look back at what you wrote for number one. Do you think the review effectively accomplished its main point? Why or why not? Do you find it persuasive? Why or why not?