Describe the role of the advanced practice nurse and the reason for pursuing an advanced degree.Discuss how a masters level nursing education makes a difference in patient-centered care and decision-making

Role of Advance Nursing

1. Describe the role of the advanced practice nurse and the reason for pursuing an advanced degree.

2. Discuss how a masters level nursing education makes a difference in patient-centered care and decision-making

.3. Discuss how the selected advanced practice role can impact career advancement.

a. Utilize the Institute of Medicine (IOM) report: The Future of Nursing Leading Change, Advancing Health (found in Modules/Week 3) in the discussion.

4. The scholarly paper should be in narrative format and 3 to 4 pages excluding the title and reference page.

5. Include an introductory paragraph, purpose statement, and a conclusion.

6. Include level 1 headings to organize the paper.

7. Write the paper in third person, not first person (meaning do not use ‘we’ or ‘’) and in a scholarly manner.

To clarify we, you, me, our may not be used. In addition, describing yourself as the researcher or the author should not be used.

8. Include three professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal references to support the paper (review in Ulrich Periodical Directory) and be less than five years old.9. APA format is required (attention to spelling/grammar, a title page, a reference page, and in-text citations).

What do you think should be the order of priority of each of the nine transportation issues today?How would this prioritization address issues in retail logistics?

Overview of Transportation; Retail Logistics Issues

Minimum of 250 words answer the two below questions.

1. What do you think should be the order of priority of each of the nine transportation issues today?

2. How would this prioritization address issues in retail logistics?

LINKS: Page 1-10 of:

How did EFL teachers at an international university in Riyadh  adapted to online teaching during the pandemic.

How did EFL teachers at an international university in Riyadh  adapted to online teaching during the pandemic.

Write a 15000 word on the Research Question which has been attached.

State that 400 teachers were sent this survey, however only 65 completed the survey, Make the information as authentic as possible.  improve on the areas the tutors has commented on.

Discuss how successful the selected firm has been at delivering value to its shareholders.Analyse the historical total shareholder return (TSR) and economic value

Pennsylvania Healthcare Legislation

Introduction to the selected organisation (what it is, who its key competitors are, how it operates, its industry sector) must be included

Part 1 – historical performance (over past 5 years)

Based on the systematic comparative appraisal of the selected firm’s historical performance:

Discuss how successful the selected firm has been at delivering value to its shareholders

Analyse the historical total shareholder return (TSR) and economic value

added (EVA) for the selected firm and its principal competitors (or appropriate benchmarks). You can also pursue or discount SVA / MVA and define you own value drivers based on the organisations annual statement.

To estimate EVA: estimate cost of capital x how much capital it has compared to what they actual earn, this explains whether they are creating more or less value then the cost of capital indicates; TSR – note down any significant events, changes in price up or down, price return plus dividends; choose an appropriate benchmark

For comparisons you should look at other firms within the same industry as your selected firm to comment on the firms performance using certain financial values and ratios.

Part 2 -prospective performance

Evaluate the current shareholder value of the selected firm.

What is the chance of success of this claim (high, low, 50/50)? Justify/explain the rationale for this opinion.oes the final sentence in the first paragraph of the problem scenario affect your advice on the most appropriate legal path? If not then why?

Criminal Law

Identification of parties, recognition of cause of action, definition – 10 marks

Why JR is appropriate in this case? 10 marks

Does Health Action and Henry have the right to claim, and if so, why? 15 marks

Are there any policy reasons to refuse JR in this case? 10 marks

An explanation of basic JR procedure – 10 marks

Grounds for JR in this case – 30 marks

JR remedies – what are they? Which one is appropriate here? – 10 marks

What are the chances of success of this claim? 5 marks

Identify the parties to any legal action that may arise from the problem scenario (the claimant/s and the defendant) – 4 marks

Identify and define the cause of action in this case (in other words, define Judicial Review, in your own words) – 3 marks
Does the final sentence in the first paragraph of the problem scenario affect your advice on the most appropriate legal path? If not then why? – 3 marks

(Worth 10 marks)

In order to make a Judicial Review claim, two initial conditions must be satisfied – the defendant must be a public body, and the issue must be a public law matter.

Define what is meant by the term ‘public body’. – 2 marks
Is the defendant a public body, and if so, why? – 4 marksc) Is the issue in this claim a public law matter, and if so, why? – 4 marks

(Worth 15 marks)

Define who has the right to claim for JR and the legal basis that must be established when making a claim under JR. – 4 marks

Does Henry have the right to make a JR claim, and if so, why? – 4 marks

Does Health Action have the right to participate in the claim, and if so, why? – 4 marks

Discuss the relevance of the Greenpeace (R v Inspectorate of Pollution, ex parte Greenpeace Ltd (No. 2) [1994]) case to the right to claim in this instance – 3 marks

(Worth 10 marks)
Summarise, in your own words, the basic procedure involved in making a JR claim (see Week 22). – 10 marks

(Worth 30 marks)
In Weeks 23 and 24, we discussed the grounds for Judicial Review. Identify and briefly explain these three grounds, in your own words. – 15 marks in total, 5 marks per ground.
Of these three grounds, identify one which you believe is relevant to Henry’s case. Explain why this particular ground you have chosen is relevant, and use case law to justify your choice. Is the ground you have chosen a strong ground? – 15 marks

(Worth 10 marks)
Identify and define the 6 remedies that are available under Judicial Review, in your own words. – 6 marks

Of these 6 remedies, which one would you advise is the most relevant in this case? – 4 marks

(Worth 5 marks)

What is the chance of success of this claim (high, low, 50/50)? Justify/explain the rationale for this opinion. – 5 marks

Explain how these response requirements to emergency situations may or may not be different if the emergency situation involves terrorism.

Implementing the Plan, Managing the Response

In this assignment, you will outline the steps to successful response to and implementation of a comprehensive emergency response plan.

In your paper,

Identify a specific type of hazard that is prevalent in your area, or use the one you identified for your discussion.

Review the response protocols for three specific entities in the community.

Examples include; law enforcement, fire protection, public works, the multifaith community, hospital, gas/electric supplier, etc.

Analyze the response requirement of your selected entities as compared to their “normal” duties and responses within the community.

Explain the similarities and differences between the response requirements of the agencies selected.

Illustrate how these groups may provide hazard mitigation, and demonstrate adaptation and resilience techniques to reduce hazard vulnerabilities.

Explain how these response requirements to emergency situations may or may not be different if the emergency situation involves terrorism.

Describe and explain your thoughts, beliefs, and feelings about the four concepts of the nursing metaparadigm and their interrelationship to one another as they guide your current practice as a nurse.

Personal phylosophy paper

Personal Philosophy Paper Outline and :

The purpose of this paper is to define, describe, and explain your thoughts, beliefs, and feelings about the four concepts of the nursing metaparadigm and their interrelationship to one another as they guide your current practice as a nurse. These are your philosophical beliefs, so there are no right or wrong answers. If your current philosophy includes any particular nursing or other theories, identify these. This paper should be no more than 5 pages not including the title page or references.

Criteria Points

Introduction – Identify the purpose of the paper 5

Description of factors influencing the development of the personal nursing philosophy 5

Definition, description, and explanation of personal thoughts, feelings, and beliefs about the concepts of the nursing metaparadigm:

1. Person/Client

2. Environment

3. Health

4. Nursing

5. Summarized interrelationship of the concepts 25

Identification and brief description of the nursing theory (theories) found to be the most compatible with the student’s personal philosophy 25

Explanation, with documentation, that demonstrated compatibility of personal philosophy with the nursing theory (theories) identified previously according to:

1. Person/Client

2. Environment

3. Health

4. Nursing

5. Summarized interrelationship of concepts 25

Summary and conclusion 5

Organization, documentation, references, APA formatting 10

Total Points 100

5 (5.00%)

Identify the purpose of the paper

5 (5.00%)

Description of factors influencing the development of the personal nursing philosophy

25 (25.00%)

Definition, description, and explanation of personal thoughts, feelings, and beliefs about the concepts of the nursing metaparadigm: 1. Person/Client 2. Environment 3. Health 4. Nursing 5. Summarized interrelationship of the concepts

25 (25.00%)

Identification and brief description of the nursing theory (theories) found to be the most compatible with the student’s personal philosophy

25 (25.00%)

Explanation, with documentation, that demonstrated compatibility of personal philosophy with the nursing theory (theories) identified previously according to: 1. Person/Client 2. Environment 3. Health 4. Nursing 5. Summarized interrelationship of concepts

5 (5.00%)

Summary and Conclusion

10 (10.00%)

Organization, documentation, references, APA formatting

Discuss your thoughts about the article as it relates to leadership contingencies. Incorporate the constituents (e.g., consideration and initiating structure) from the Ohio State Studies and the Michigan Studies to devise your response.

Complex Adaptive Leadership

Read the article, An Evaluation and Application of Complex Adaptive Leadership: A Fuzzy Logic and Neural Network Approach and articulately discuss your thoughts about the article as it relates to leadership contingencies. Incorporate the constituents (e.g., consideration and initiating structure) from the Ohio State Studies and the Michigan Studies to devise your response.