Explain the impact of relevant issues, including potential political, social, economic, and/or cultural constraints associated with this program or policy.

Research Question and Introduction Development

Describe the program or policy that is to be evaluated, including its purpose, stakeholders, history, and outcomes, which will be part of your introduction and description you completed in Week Two.
Explain the impact of relevant issues, including potential political, social, economic, and/or cultural constraints associated with this program or policy.
Proposal Narrative

Present your measures and methodology from the assignment you completed in Week Three.

Critique the design of the program or policy by describing the methodology, including the data to be collected, the means of collection, and how the data will be used.

Identify a proposed budget and projected schedule for the evaluation.
Summary

Summarize the expected outcomes, the questions to be answered, and the expected results that would indicate success of the program or policy.

The “Evaluation Proposal,” Final Paper

 Describe the methods of analysis accurately, in your own words, and demonstrating an appropriate depth of knowledge.

Food composition and analysis

An introduction which outlines the purpose of the experiment and explains the theory of the methods and technologies used (25%)

A full methodology and experimental design (method protocols should be appended or referenced) (10%)

A results section giving full results of the practical experiments, with appropriate statistical treatment and summary of results (25%)

A discussion that compares and evaluates both experimental findings and analytical methodology performance. Experimental results and literature references will be used to support the points made, with logical and appropriate conclusions drawn. (30%)
References and overall good presentation. (10%)

Students will have the opportunity to submit up to a total of 2 draft reports (each relating to different experiments) for formative feedback – see schedule above. Students should use this feedback to improve their report writing skills.

Note: The final portfolio submitted for summative assessment should contain a minimum of 2 experimental reports. A separate word count should be provided for each report.

When producing each report, you should be able to:

Describe the methods of analysis accurately, in your own words, and demonstrating an appropriate depth of knowledge.

Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these technologies / methods.

Cite peer reviewed and reliable sources of information.

Present experimental results clearly, completely, and appropriately, in tables and figures.

Calculate results correctly from the data presented, and employ appropriate statistical tests (as appropriate).

Evaluate the design/performance of the employed analytical methods using valid criteria (e.g. validity, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, reproducibility, technical performance, cost) with comparisons to alternative approaches and technologies
Use experimental results and literature to support the points made in the evaluation.

Prepare a well-constructed report with clarity of expression, using concise language within the word count.

Ensure conclusions address the key research questions posed by the experimental brief, and that specific recommendations for action and/or further work be made