Who was the author of this article? Are they an expert in the field, someone who is reporting what experts have reported, or are they sharing their opinion?Why is this topic worthwhile to write about? What is the purpose of the article? Who is it directed toward? Who was likely to be reading it where it was originally published? WHY would this topic interest readers?

Field Assignment: Article Analysis #3

Use the following section headings and write at least one paragraph to describe each:

Summarize the article in 4-6 sentences. One of these sentences must contain the main idea of the article.
Author

Who was the author of this article? Are they an expert in the field, someone who is reporting what experts have reported, or are they sharing their opinion?

What is the author trying to accomplish by writing this article? Is there an ‘agenda’ that you think the author has for writing the article and leading the reader through his/her thinking, or a conclusion you think the author is trying to lead you to? If so, what might that be?

Why is this topic worthwhile to write about? What is the purpose of the article? Who is it directed toward? Who was likely to be reading it where it was originally published? WHY would this topic interest readers?

In a strong paragraph, summarize the ‘message’ from this article. What would the author want you to remember from it?
Personal Application

What was your impression of the article? Did what you learned from reading this change your thinking in any way? How can/will you use the information from this article in your work with children? Are there conclusions drawn by the author that you strongly agree or disagree with? This is your educated, reasoned opinion but you need to back up your opinion with information from the article.

Summarize, analyze, and compare the views of Smith, Marx, Keynes, Schumpeter, and one other “worldly philosopher” of your choosing represented in Teachings from the Worldly Philosophy on the long-term future of “the economy” or “capitalism” (Smith and Malthus did not use the term, but each had thoughts about the future of the economy they described).

Philosophy on the long-term future of “the economy” or “capitalism”

ALERT: You will need the following book to do this essay! Teachings from the Worldly Philosophy Robert L. HeilbronerApr 1997 W. W. Norton & Company Part 1.

Respond to the following in thoughtful, well-organized essays. Engagement with relevant course materials is essential.

You should use brief, informal parenthetical citations to identify sources (just the author’s last name and a brief title of the document or a page number). Approximately 4-5 pages (750-1000 words).

Summarize, analyze, and compare the views of Smith, Marx, Keynes, Schumpeter, and one other “worldly philosopher” of your choosing represented in Teachings from the Worldly Philosophy on the long-term future of “the economy” or “capitalism” (Smith and Malthus did not use the term, but each had thoughts about the future of the economy they described).

What do you see when you compare the coefficients on RootCause estimated in those two regressions? Why do we see those results in 2 and 3?

Math/Physic/Economic/Statistic Problems

Create a 1000 observation dataset. Generate variables RootCause and OtherThing as independent, uncorrelated variables each drawn from a normal distribution with mean 0 and variance

1. Create a set of normal error terms with mean 0 and variance 1. Let Outcome = 1 + RootCause + 3OtherThing + errors.

1. Draw a graphical representation of the data generating process (DGP) involving the variables Outcome, RootCause, and OtherThing, that is, show by drawing arrows how these three variables relate to each other in the data you generated. Are RootCause and OtherThing independent?

If you think they are independent, how would you represent graphically that they are independent in your DGP? If you think they are not independent, how would you represent graphically that they are not independent in your DGP?

2. Regress Outcome on RootCause. Report and interpret the result. Did you estimate the causal effect of RootCause on Outcome with this regression? Did you estimate the causal effect of RootCause on Outcome with this regression?

If you think you were able to estimate this causal effect, why do you think you were able to do so with this regression? If you think you were not able to estimate this causal effect, why do you think you were not able to do so with this regression?

3. Regress Outcome on RootCause and OtherThing. Report and interpret the result. Did you estimate the causal effect of RootCause on Outcome?

If you think you were able to estimate this causal effect, why do you think you were able to do so with this regression? If you think you were not able to estimate this causal effect, why do you think you were not able to do so with this regression?

4. Compare the results of the regressions you ran in 2 and 3.

What do you see when you compare the coefficients on RootCause estimated in those two regressions? Why do we see those results in 2 and 3?
Problem set 8

Clear your work space and create a new data set with 1000 observations. Generate variable RootCause following a normal distribution with mean 0 and variance

1. Generate variable OtherThing = 2RootCause + noise where noise follows a normal distribution with mean 0 and variance 1. Create a set of normal error terms with mean 0 and variance 1. Let Outcome = 1 + RootCause + 3OtherThing + errors.

1. Draw a graphical representation of the data generating process (DGP) involving the variables Outcome, RootCause, and OtherThing, that is, show by drawing arrows how these three variables relate to each other in the data you generated.

2. Regress Outcome on RootCause. Report and interpret the result. Did you estimate the causal effect of RootCause on Outcome with this regression?

If you think you were able to estimate this causal effect, why do you think you were able to do so with this regression? If you think you were not able to estimate this causal effect, why do you think you were not able to do so with this regression?

3. Regress Outcome on RootCause and OtherThing. Report and interpret the result.

Did you estimate the causal effect of RootCause on Outcome? If you think you were able to estimate this causal effect, why do you think you were able to do so with this regression? If you think you were not able to estimate this causal effect, why do you think you were not able to do so with this regression?

4. Compare the results of the regressions you ran in 2 and 3. What do you see when you compare the coefficients on RootCause estimated in those two regressions?

Why do we see those results in 2 and 3? In your answer, explain how those results are related to the question whether the regression of Outcome on RootCause and OtherThing meets the conditional independence assumption.

Analyze the below scenario from Chapter 13 of the Whisenand textbook. You will then write and submit a memorandum, using the document template attached for content and format.

problem anyalysis and response memo

You will analyze the below scenario from Chapter 13 of the Whisenand textbook. You will then write and submit a memorandum, using the document template attached for content and format.

Scenario:

A local restaurant/bar in your area started featuring live amateur rock bands on weekends and the bands draw large crowds of young people.

Over the past two months, noise complaints have tripled in the area; citizens have called in and mailed in complaints of excessive trash, drunken bar patrons urinating in their yards, drug use in the area, fights in the street, speeding vehicles, and an increase in property damage. Drunken driving arrests have increased and have been linked to the bar. Also, two of the band’s staff members were arrested for possession of firearms.

The restaurant owner has ample security/bouncers and has done all he can do to mitigate problems, but he is making a lot of money and is in compliance with all the city’s requirements in terms of zoning, permits, business license, and so on. As a police manager, what steps would you take using the COP/POP philosophy to ensure this problem was solved?

Scenario two home Sweet home Several large shelters for the homelss

Evaluate the potential impact of your meeting and the launching of your TQ plan, including two (2) strengths and two (2) weaknesses of the plan.

Quality Management – Assignment 4
BZ440 Quality Control

Directions: Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English, spelling and grammar.

Sources must be cited in APA format. Your response should be four (4) double-spaced pages; refer to the “Assignment Format” page located on the Course Home page for specific format requirements.

One of the philosophies mentioned in your text includes the strategy of Plan, Do, Check, and Act. keep this philosophy in mind when considering the information required below.

1. Discuss the premise of TQ. Then, design a TQ initiative for a company of your choosing, outlining steps that will provide internal and external support for your initiative.

2. Outline a plan for a team meeting with your managers, and elaborate how together you will disseminate this plan to the entire company.

3. Evaluate the potential impact of your meeting and the launching of your TQ plan, including two (2) strengths and two (2) weaknesses of the plan.

Discuss the critical elements in the execution of a quality plan. As you formulate your paper, consider the importance of leadership strategies, stakeholder identification, and the development of a quality philosophy based on the mission of the organization.

Module Three Short Paper

Discuss the critical elements in the execution of a quality plan. As you formulate your paper, consider the importance of leadership strategies, stakeholder identification, and the development of a quality philosophy based on the mission of the organization.

Should we side with Rawls or Nozick when it comes to understanding how we ought to achieve justice and fairness within our society? Answer this question by briefly explaining Rawls’ and Nozick’s positions on this issue, and offer a critical analysis of both views.

Rawls and Nozick

ONLY USE THE READING MATERIAL PROVIDED!!! Nothing ELSE

Should we side with Rawls or Nozick when it comes to understanding how we ought to achieve justice and fairness within our society? Answer this question by briefly explaining Rawls’ and Nozick’s positions on this issue, and offer a critical analysis of both views.

Guidelines for Writing Assignments:

1.Your essay must be a minimum of 500 words.

2. You must reference specific page numbers and quotes from our text anytime you’re using a quote or referring to something in our reading.

3. Outside sources are not allowed for this assignment.

4. Your writing assignment must be uploaded as a .doc or .docx file.

Philosophy Writing Assignment

Philosophy Writing Assignment

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Grammar / Style

These points cover the grammatical correctness, sentence structure, spelling, and punctuation found in your essay.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Interpretation
These points cover how accurately you interpret and explain our assigned reading.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis
These points cover how strong and convincing of a critical analysis you offer in your essay.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Assignment Parameters

These points concern whether you’ve meet the assignment parameters (e.g. word count, address the correct topic, post in the right area, meet the deadline)

Provide a description of the type of students you believe you would like to work with or teach at this point in your training (age/level, disability) and provide a rationale for your choice.

 

The personal philosophy paper gives students an opportunity to critically evaluate their professional and personal views of serving children with disabilities, examine the course of their professional training to date, and demonstrate their ability to choose research-based strategies specific to certain disabilities.

While not all students taking this class are or will become special educators, this paper must focus on serving students with specific disabilities in your setting, whether a general education classroom, a counseling setting or in a speech therapy setting, to give a few examples.

Write a 4-page paper. Reference page is an additional page, not included in aforementioned requirements. adhere to page limits–points are deducted for exceeding page limits.

The paper must be double-spaced, typed in a 12 point Times New Roman font with 1” margins all around.

References must be cited in the body of your paper, as well as included in a reference page at the end of your paper.

Citations & the reference page must be in APA (7th ed.) style (no abstract, title page or running head is necessary).
At least two references must be included to document your sources in this paper.

One reference must be one of our textbooks and the others must be from a peer-refereed professional journal (not a book, web page, magazine, newspaper, etc.) published no earlier than 2016.

You must use original sources, rather than secondary sources, i.e., you cannot use information from an article referenced in another publication, but must access the original publication yourself. You must paraphrase. Do not use direct quotes.

The source for paraphrased material must be cited in the body of the paper using APA parenthetical citation.

Failure to do so constitutes plagiarism.

The personal philosophy paper must include the following sections, and the following subheadings are preferred:
Students I Desire to Serve

Provide a description of the type of students you believe you would like to work with or teach at this point in your training (age/level, disability) and provide a rationale for your choice.

You must choose a specific IDEA disability category rather than all students with disabilities. This will help focus your search for instructional strategies.

Instructional Strategies

Provide complete descriptions of two research-based instructional strategies you plan to use when you work with these students, and why, with documentation:

(a) fully describe the strategies and give an example of classroom use;

(b) cover how they address specific weaknesses and/or utilize the strengths of your chosen population;

(c) provide scientific evidence (numerical data on the results of the study) of the strategies’ effectiveness; and

(d) Provide proper APA citation for each strategy.

Extended Professional Skills Desired and Plan for Acquisition

Extended professional skills are those that reach beyond the skills and competencies required for licensure.

Include a description of two extended professional teaching skills you hope to acquire to best serve your students and a concrete plan of action describing when, where and how you will acquire the professional teaching skills that you have described.

Personal Philosophy of Education

Include a statement of your personal philosophy of general or special education, including a reflection on serving diverse populations.

see the prologue (p. 2) & postscript (p. 559) of the Heward textbook for suggestions on developing a personal philosophy of special education

enclosed the article chose

What do you sell provide? What are your general beliefs, approach, or intent?How do you value, respect, and develop

Mission Statement
Multiple components of the Mission may be contained within a single sentence.
1. Customers: Who buys the product or service?
2. Products or services: What do you sell provide?
3. Markets: Where, Geographically, do you compete?
4. Technology: How does it apply to your business?
5. Concern for survival, profits, growth: Be explicit , but fair.
6. Philosophy: What are your general beliefs, approach, or intent?
7. Self-concept: What is your primary competitive advantage?
8. Concern for public image: How do you serve communities, society, and the environment
9. Concern for employees: How do you value, respect, and develop?

What are your plans/ideas to maintain your clinical practice role as you begin your role as nursing faculty (undergraduate or graduate faculty)?

Got Plans/Ideas to Maintain Clinical Practice?

What are your plans/ideas to maintain your clinical practice role as you begin your role as nursing faculty (undergraduate or graduate faculty)?

Include Pragmatic plans/ideas. You may want to interview another nurse faculty who works in both roles as this week’s citation. See APA Manual 7th (8.9) on how to cite “personal communication.”

See AACN Essentials 2021: Clinical expectations>Clinical sites (p. 20-21) AACN 2021 Essentials>Clinical expectations p. 20 (Links to an external site.)

See book by Roy, C., & Jones, D. A. (2007). Nursing Knowledge Development and Clinical Practice, Nursing Philosophy, 9(4), 279-80.