Tag: Systems psychology

Based on your findings, describe at least two of the functional health pattern strengths noted in the findings. Discuss three areas in which health problems or barriers to health were identified.

Family Health Assessment Part I

Understanding family structure and style is essential to patient and family care. Conducting a family interview and needs assessment gathers information to identify strengths, as well as potential barriers to health. This information ultimately helps develop family-centered strategies for support and guidance.

This family health assessment is a two-part assignment. The information you gather in this initial assignment will be utilized for the second assignment in Topic 3.

Develop an interview questionnaire to be used in a family-focused functional assessment. The questionnaire must include three open-ended, family-focused questions to assess functional health patterns for each of the following:

Values/Health Perception

Nutrition

Sleep/Rest

Elimination

Activity/Exercise

Cognitive

Sensory-Perception

Self-Perception

Role Relationship

Sexuality

Coping

Select a family, other than your own, and seek permission from the family to conduct an interview. Utilize the interview questions complied in your interview questionnaire to conduct a family-focused functional assessment. Document the responses as you conduct the interview.

Upon completion of the interview, write a 750-1,000-word paper. Analyze your assessment findings. Submit your questionnaire as an appendix with your assignment.

Include the following in your paper:

Describe the family structure. Include individuals and any relevant attributes defining the family composition, race/ethnicity, social class, spirituality, and environment.

Summarize the overall health behaviors of the family. Describe the current health of the family.

Based on your findings, describe at least two of the functional health pattern strengths noted in the findings. Discuss three areas in which health problems or barriers to health were identified.

Describe how family systems theory can be applied to solicit changes in family members that, in turn, initiate positive changes to the overall family functions over time.

Cite at least three peer-reviewed or scholarly sources to complete this assignment. Sources should be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a.  review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Course Materials if you need assistance.

Provide your definition and explanation of what constitutes human factors as a systems discipline. Provide a timeline to illustrate your main points.

Systems psychology

Or this module’s research paper, provide your definition and explanation of what constitutes human factors as a systems discipline. Provide a timeline to illustrate your main points. Follow the formatting guidelines of the APA Manual where needed in your creative assignment.

Examine the Research below to identify the qualities of an effective assignment.

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContext/Introduction
15 pts

Excellent / 13 – 15 Points / Paper provides an effective introduction and a research problem that is intrinsically related to the field of aeronautical science.

It presents strong relationships between factors with accurate real-world examples. It develops a coherent, central theme that is expressed in a well-structured, organized, and logically-consistent manner throughout the assignment.
12 pts

Satisfactory / 11 – 12 Points / Paper provides a good introduction and a research problem related to the field of aeronautical science. It presents reasonable relationships between factors with real-world examples.

It develops a good central theme that is expressed in a structured, organized and consistent manner throughout the assignment.
10 pts

Passing / 9 – 10 / Paper provides a satisfactory introduction. Research problem is fairly related to the field of aeronautical science.

It provides satisfactory relationships between factors with examples and specific details. It develops some level of a central theme that is expressed in an acceptably organized manner.
8 pts

Failure / 0 – 8 Points / Paper provides poor or no introduction. Research problem is inadequate and/or has no relation to the field of aeronautical science.

It presents no coherent central theme, no structure and no organization whatsoever.
15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch
25 pts

Excellent / 23 – 25 Points / Paper provides a comprehensive identification and analysis of key issues in the realm of aeronautical science.

It designs an effective course of action to solve the proposed research problem using multi-disciplinary principles, if appropriate.

The evidence comes from a wide variety of valid sources. The bibliography is complete and reflects the appropriate sources.
22 pts

Satisfactory / 21 – 22 Points / Paper provides a good identification and analysis of key issues in the realm of aeronautical science. It designs a good course of action to solve the proposed research problem using multi-disciplinary principles, if appropriate. The evidence comes from many valid sources. The bibliography is complete.
20 pts

Passing / 19 – 20 Points / Paper identifies and analyzes at least a few key issues in the realm of aeronautical science. It designs a satisfactory course of action to solve the proposed research problem. The evidence comes from a satisfactory number of sources. The bibliography is missing some pieces.
18 pts

Failure / 0 – 18 Points / Writing generally shows poor or no evidence the student has done the required research and analysis of key issues in the realm of aeronautical science. Instead, it generally consists of opinions, feelings and impressions. The bibliography is nonexistent.
25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComprehension
25 pts

Excellent / 23 – 25 Points / Paper presents a strong, well-supported argument based on relevant concepts and theories, providing new ideas to the field of aeronautical science.

Argument is logical and uses significant examples, evidence, research, and/or data from course content and from valid, external information sources throughout assignment.
22 pts

Satisfactory / 21 – 22 Points / Paper presents a good argument based on pertinent concepts, theories, and frameworks that provides some ideas to the field of aeronautical science.

Argument is logical and uses good examples, evidence, research, and/or data from course content and from satisfactory external information sources throughout assignment.
20 pts

Passing / 19 – 20 Points / Paper presents a valid argument with sparse reference to relevant concepts, theories and/or frameworks that provides ideas to the field of aeronautical science.

Argument is fairly logical and uses satisfactory examples, evidence, research, and/or data from course content and from external information sources throughout assignment.
18 pts

Failure / 0 – 18 Points / Argument, when presented, is from evidence and personal opinion. It contains poor linkages to relevant concepts, theories and/or framework. Minimal or no evidence is presented to validate analysis, evaluation or other important elements in the assignment.
25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication
25 pts

Excellent / 23 – 25 Points / Decisions and conclusions are a result of outstanding analysis and synthesis of evidence. Formulates excellent resolution and recommendations.

Conclusion includes possible consequences and outcome scenarios.
22 pts

Satisfactory / 21 – 22 Points / Decisions and conclusions are a result of effective analysis and synthesis of evidence. It formulates good resolution, recommendations.

Conclusion includes consequences and outcome scenarios.
20 pts

Passing / 19 – 20 Points / Decisions and conclusions are a result of good analysis and synthesis of evidence. Formulates satisfactory resolution, recommendations. Conclusion does not include consequences and outcome scenarios.
18 pts

Failure / 0 – 18 Points / A partial or minimal attempt is made to offer a resolution, recommendations. Conclusion may be vague, incomplete and/or inappropriate.
25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle & Mechanics
10 pts

Excellent / 8 – 10 Points / Paper efficiently uses current APA guidelines in citations and references. Text is grammatically-sound and free of spelling errors and follows required formatting rules.
10 pts

Passing / 4 – 5 Points / APA guidelines are seldom ignored throughout text, which has major grammar and spelling errors. Formatting rules are satisfactory followed.
10 pts

Satisfactory / 6 – 7 Points / Paper uses current APA guidelines in citations and references. Text has minor grammar and spelling errors, but follows required formatting rules.
3 pts

Failure / 0 – 3 Points / Citations, when present, are sometimes missing and/or are incorrect. A low level of writing is exhibited with a number of mechanical mistakes. Communication is muddle or incomprehensible.
10 pts
Total Points: 100

Explain how these pathologies might apply in a human factors application scenario of your own making. Differentiate between what may be pathologies versus biases.

Systems psychology

You will be presenting at a seminar as a panel member recognized as an expert on systems analysis.

With regard to the Human-Centred Requirements Engineering (HUCRE) workload and performance analysis method, selected cognitive pathologies have been identified and embedded in the model.

Explain how these pathologies might apply in a human factors application scenario of your own making. Differentiate between what may be pathologies versus biases.

Follow the formatting guidelines of the APA Manual where needed in your creative assignment

Utilizing this article as one source

A. Gregoriades & A. G. Sutcliffe (2006) Automated assistance for human factors analysis in complex systems, Ergonomics, 49:12-13, 1265-1287, DOI: 10.1080/00140130600612721

Prepare a position paper for the engineers to read that explains what is involved and the benefits that can be realized.Also, provide a few key actions or steps that would move toward accomplishing the director’s intent.

Systems psychology

You are a human factors specialist in your company and a project director has asked you to develop a strategy to broaden the perspectives of the systems engineers when designing projects.

In particular, the director asks that you illustrate how including human factors contributors early in the process can affect the system development more positively and inclusively.

Prepare a position paper for the engineers to read that explains what is involved and the benefits that can be realized.

Also, provide a few key actions or steps that would move toward accomplishing the director’s intent. Follow the formatting guidelines of the APA Manual where needed in your creative assignment.

Direct your particular attention to the aspects concerning weighting, bipolar pairs, two interconnected layers, and three types of attractors. Would you consider this model suitable for selected complex and dynamic human-centric systems?

Systems psychology

Consider the nonlinear dynamic artificial neural network model for memory as a template for other human factors engineering applications.

Direct your particular attention to the aspects concerning weighting, bipolar pairs, two interconnected layers, and three types of attractors. Would you consider this model suitable for selected complex and dynamic human-centric systems?

Indicate how you believe these aspects would support or not support your choice. Follow the formatting guidelines of the APA Manual where needed in your creative assignment.

In complex and dynamic systems, there are interrelationships and influences. Describe your understanding of how this situation can be approached to minimize the risk of failures.

Systems psychology

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis is grounded in considering each failure as an independent event.

In complex and dynamic systems, there are interrelationships and influences. Describe your understanding of how this situation can be approached to minimize the risk of failures.

Follow the formatting guidelines of the APA Manual where needed in your creative assignment.