Blog

Develop the skills required to demonstrate self-management in a variety of settings.

ASSIGNMENT BRIEF

This is a 1000 (+ or – 10%) word case study which is ideally based upon the episode of care that you have completed in practice, in you MYEPAD.

IF this has not yet been undertaken, focus on a patient or client for whom you have provided an episode of care during your placement.
Learning Outcomes:

1. Under supervision, begin to develop basic competence skills in assessment, and the safe delivery of foundational practice.

2. Develop the skills required to demonstrate self-management in a variety of settings.

Through the case study, acknowledgement of the important elements of patient care, as well as building on one’s knowledge base can be demonstrated.

Identify the interrelationships between religion and philosophical worldviews.

Trigonometry

Note on Research Project:
Your mark will be based on your critical reading of the material, your writing ability (especially citing specific material which influences or supports your ideas —  use MLA citations), your understanding of the vocabulary and concepts, and how well you can identify the interrelationships between religion and philosophical worldviews. do not just reiterate or describe the material from the academic sources, but rather, subject it to critical assessment and evaluation (including material from a practitioner’s perspective).

You may use ‘First Person’ in this project (in fact want to hear YOUR VOICE).

Make note if there are any differences between the sources (academic or practice perspective) in their interpretation or presentation of “factual” material. Also, make note if there are controversies associated with the topic, or specific aspects of it. Pointing out these ‘controversies’ makes for a great ‘Discussion Paper’.

Identify the steps you took to identify a funding source, describe in as much detail as is available the parameters of the grant, and evaluate the fit between your project’s needs and the grant’s target.

Identifying a Funding Source – Grant writing
In this assignment, research the funding sites given in this and previous units to find a source that might fund your project.

Provide specific details on the funding source, including the name, type (public or private), affiliations, mission, amount of grant, list of requirements, and eligibility.

You may not find all this information (especially for non-government grants) on the grant search sites.

You may need to search the Internet for information on the organization.

It is always best to know as much as you can about the funding sources before applying.

In a 2–4 page paper, identify the steps you took to identify a funding source, describe in as much detail as is available the parameters of the grant, and evaluate the fit between your project’s needs and the grant’s target.

Finally, evaluate whether there are any potential ethical issues between the grant’s parameters and requirements and the NASW code of ethics.

Consider where these factors align, but also where they diverge. Use scholarly sources to back your arguments regarding fit.

Summarize two qualitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.

Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations

Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two qualitative research studies. Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part 1” document to organize your essay.

Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide rationale, include examples, and reference content from the studies in your responses.

Use the practice problem and two qualitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.

summarize two qualitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a.  review the  prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion

Discuss more info from the results section and how it relates to nursing (very important ), impact of nursing, fluorine section, etc (discuss all results included in paper).

Literature Review

provide 2 pages of discussion in the literature review. This is a completed literature review that needs more words for the Discussion part. Only refer to citations within the essay.

Also  discuss more info from the results section and how it relates to nursing (very important ), impact of nursing, fluorine section, etc (discuss all results included in paper).

You only need the literature review which is uploaded to finish the discussion for discussion part. however, is more facts,continue with. APA 7 only .

Provide your recommendations of key determinants that contribute to successful teams and how they can be implemented in an organization.

Deliverable 1 – Roles and Behaviors of Teams

Competency

Evaluate the roles and behaviors of teams in organizational settings.

Student Success Criteria

View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “This item is graded with a ” link, which is located in the Details & Information pane.

Scenario

As a leader, you have been tasked with building a team whose purpose is to recommend a new performance evaluation system.

The current system is outdated and greatly reduces employee morale each year.

As the leader of this problem-solving team, you are tasked with assessing types of teams, benefits, and determinants of successful teams.

The company has asked you for a two-page report outlining issues and recommendations for team interventions.

In your report, you will want to:

Compare the types of teams and how they are utilized within an organization.

Discuss habits that can be used to enhance team success.

Summarize the advantages of teams and benefits of teams in relation to the organization, manager, and employees.

Provide your recommendations of key determinants that contribute to successful teams and how they can be implemented in an organization.

What are three factors contributing to this dilemma?What should the practice do, if anything, to appease the staff members?

Directions: Using the supplemental readings, outside sources and/or the text, answer the following questions:

1. What are the facts of this case?

2. What are three factors contributing to this dilemma?

3. What should the practice do, if anything, to appease the staff members?

 Describe the methods of analysis accurately, in your own words, and demonstrating an appropriate depth of knowledge.

Food composition and analysis

As part of the food composition and analysis unit, students will identify and quantify target analytes in a range of food matrices, with each case study providing a commercial brief and experimental aim(s) for this work.

Students will write a report detailing the results of each these practical investigations, to address the investigative requirements of their employer/client. Students will submit a portfolio of their best work for summative assessment.

Each report should include the following:

An introduction which outlines the purpose of the experiment and explains the theory of the methods and technologies used (25%)

A full methodology and experimental design (method protocols should be appended or referenced) (10%)

A results section giving full results of the practical experiments, with appropriate statistical treatment and summary of results (25%)

A discussion that compares and evaluates both experimental findings and analytical methodology performance. Experimental results and literature references will be used to support the points made, with logical and appropriate conclusions drawn. (30%)

References and overall good presentation. (10%)

Students will have the opportunity to submit up to a total of 2 draft reports (each relating to different experiments) for formative feedback – see schedule above. Students should use this feedback to improve their report writing skills.

Note: The final portfolio submitted for summative assessment should contain a minimum of 2 experimental reports. A separate word count should be provided for each report.

When producing each report, you should be able to:

Describe the methods of analysis accurately, in your own words, and demonstrating an appropriate depth of knowledge.

Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these technologies / methods.

Cite peer reviewed and reliable sources of information.

Present experimental results clearly, completely, and appropriately, in tables and figures.

Calculate results correctly from the data presented, and employ appropriate statistical tests (as appropriate).

Evaluate the design/performance of the employed analytical methods using valid criteria (e.g. validity, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, reproducibility, technical performance, cost) with comparisons to alternative approaches and technologies

Use experimental results and literature to support the points made in the evaluation.

Prepare a well-constructed report with clarity of expression, using concise language within the word count.

Ensure conclusions address the key research questions posed by the experimental brief, and that specific recommendations for action and/or further work be made

Identify the similarities, differences, strengths and weaknesses of the basic tenants and arguments of each theory or philosopher. Demonstrate the application of each theory or philosopher with real world examples of ethical dilemmas and how they could be resolved.

Your Signature Assignment for this course is a 3-4 page paper (excluding cover page and references) with cited research, utilizing at least a minimum of 2 academic sources

Module 8 signature assignment instructions introductions to ethics
Your Signature Assignment for this course is a 3-4 page paper (excluding cover page and references) with cited research, utilizing at least a minimum of 2 academic sources from web research. Pick two ethical theories or philosophers.

Identify the similarities, differences, strengths and weaknesses of the basic tenants and arguments of each theory or philosopher. Demonstrate the application of each theory or philosopher with real world examples of ethical dilemmas and how they could be resolved.

Pick one of the theories or philosophers with which you agree most and explain why you prefer that ethical view over the other Explain how the ethical theories and decision-making constructs of this philosophy contribute to your own ethical code and to the potential development of a 21st century global ethical standard. Remember to apply relevant concepts and terminology in your analysis and explanations. Your goal is to make an argument and support it with clear, original and thorough analysis of the themes, arguments, vocabulary, terms and information presented in the course readings and lectures.

Your work will be evaluated for the specificity with which it answers the prompt, the clarity of its thesis, the cohesiveness of its argument, and the extent to which it demonstrates a clear understanding of the central content, critical ideas, and key themes of the course.

Writing Guidelines Include an introduction to your topic and a thesis statement. Keep in mind that your essays are graded for content relevant to demonstrating the Course Student Learning Outcomes found on the Course Homepage. Your essay must be double-spaced wit 1-inch margins and typed in 12-point Times New Roman font.

Your essay should have a Title Page and a Reference Page. Your essay should be organized with an easy to read narrative voice. use bold substantive sub topic headings to guide the reader through your essay. You must use in-text citation to avoid plagiarism. Essays should be proofread for spelling and grammar errors.